Determining the <i>sp</i><sup>2</sup>/<i>sp</i><sup>3</sup> bonding concentrations of carbon films using X-ray absorption spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The sp 2 bonding concentrations of nitrogen-doped amorphous carbon samples and nanodiamond films were determined from their soft X-ray absorption spectra. The amorphous carbon (a-C) samples were deposited under atmospheres of varying nitrogen concentrations onto polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) polymer and silicon substrates. The nanodiamond films were synthesized on silicon substrates in a CH 4 /H 2 gas mixture by microwave plasma chemical vapour deposition. The sp 2 bonding concentrations in the a-C films (deposited on PTFE substrates) increase from 74% to 93% as nitrogen doping increases, with a step-like increase in sp 2 fraction when nitrogen concentrations in the films exceed 27%. The a-C films on silicon substrates display the same trend of increasing sp 2 concentration as a function of greater nitrogen concentration. Nanodiamond deposition conditions, such as bias voltage and methane concentration, affect the purity of the film. Our analysis reveals sp 2 bonding concentrations in these samples ranging from a few percent to 11%.PACS Nos.: 78.70.Dm, 61.10.Ht, 61.46.+w, 81.05.Uw
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".