Design and validation of transducers to measure interface force distribution in a spinal orthosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scoliosis is a spinal deformity that affects millions of adolescents in the United States. Bracing is the most common non-surgical treatment method for scoliosis, but the biomechanics of such treatment is unclear. The objective of this study is to develop and validate a force logging system that can record forces at multiple locations inside a brace, as well as brace strap tension, and correlate these forces with different body positions. The force logging system can be used to investigate the biomechanics function of a brace to treat scoliosis during the treatment period. Two phases were completed in this study: design phase, involving custom development and calibration of strap tension transducers and modifications of in-brace force transducers; and validation phase, including preliminary testing on a subject with different postures. In-brace force load cell and tension transducer were tested and validated. Their sensitivities were 193.5±4.9mV/N and 35.5±0.2mV/N, respectively, with both linear correlation coefficients were 0.99, reflecting high repeatability and linearity. Qualitative validation was also completed, allowing general relationships to be found between subject posture and force distribution. This study shows an excellent functionality and utility of the developed system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".