The Limited Effectiveness of a Home- Based Eccentric Training for Treatment of Achilles Tendinopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Objective was to evaluate the outcome of a standardized heavy load eccentric training program in adults with chronic painful Achilles tendinopathy, and the presence of increased Colour Doppler activity in diseased and non-diseased adults. The hypothesis was that patient satisfaction would fall within the range of average satisfaction present in the literature (60 to 90%). METHODS: Twenty patients were instructed on a training program based on the Alfredson protocol of straight leg followed by bent knee heel drops and raises. Patient satisfaction was recorded as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the VISA-A and Tegner scales. Twenty one subjects without present or history of lower extremity pain and seven patients presenting at the clinic but without Achilles tendinopathy were included as controls. RESULTS: Patient satisfaction was significantly lower when compared to the literature as two patients reported that they were satisfied with the treatment while the remaining 15 reported that they were unsatisfied. Three patients were excluded from the analysis as they were unable to complete the exercises. Increased Colour Doppler activity was present in only one participant without the disease and in all patients with the disease at the end of the study (increased Colour Doppler activity was present in 40% of patients with the disease at the beginning of the study). CONCLUSION: Although some patients' symptoms improved over time, eccentric training did not satisfy patient expectations of improvement following treatment despite compliance with the home based program. Although it is a mainstay of treatment, other options, which are both efficacious and effective, need to be provided for patients who prefer a conservative and relatively non-invasive treatment option from the start.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".