MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128636331 · doi:10.2174/157016208785132563

Factors Controlling Chromatin Organization and Nucleosome Positioning for Establishment and Maintenance of HIV Latency

2008· review· en· W2128636331 on OpenAlexafffund
Ivan Sadowski, Pedro Lourenço, Tom Malcolm

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent HIV Research · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsChromatinProvirusNucleosomeCell biologyHistoneChromatin remodelingBiologyTranscription (linguistics)Histone H3GeneticsDNAGeneGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transcription of the integrated HIV provirus is subject to regulation by chromatin organization and must employ host cell transcription factors and chromatin modifying complexes to promote the formation of latency, and then reverse this process to replicate in response to T cell activation. The repressed latent HIV-1 proviral 5' LTR is organized into a defined structure where two de-acetylated and positioned nucleosomes flank the enhancer region, presumably imposing a block to transcriptional initiation and elongation. LTR-associated nucleosomes undergo further histone H3 K9 trimethylation, to cause silencing by recruitment of HP1. In this article, we review current understanding of how the transcriptionally silenced provirus might be established through the function of transcription factors that bind conserved cis-elements, including SP1, YY1, NF-kappaB, CBF-1 and RBF-2 (USF/TFII-I), and propose mechanisms by which factors bound to the repressed LTR can enable reactivation in response to cell signaling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent HIV ResearchSame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207