MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128664259 · doi:10.3171/ped.2004.100.2.0118

Multiple subpial transections in the treatment of pediatric epilepsy

2004· article· en· W2128664259 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey P. Blount, Wayne Langburt, Hiroshi Otsubo, Shiro Chitoku, Ayako Ochi, Shelly K. Weiss, O. Carter Snead, James T. Rutka

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEpilepsyPediatric epilepsyNeurosciencePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECT: The technique involved in multiple subpial transections (MSTs) allows the surgeon treating patients with epilepsy the capability to make disconnective lesions in epileptogenic regions of eloquent cortex. Although there have been increasing numbers of reports in adults of the efficacy and relative safety of this technique, there are relatively few such reports in children. The authors present their experience in 30 children who underwent MSTs during the surgical management of the seizure disorder. METHODS: Thirty consecutive children who underwent MSTs with or without cortical excision form the basis of this retrospective review. An analysis of neurological adverse effects following MSTs and seizure outcome was performed. Between 1996 and 2000, MSTs were performed either as stand-alone therapy (four patients) or in conjunction with planned cortical excisions (26 patients). Twenty-three children underwent invasive monitoring after placement of subdural grid electrodes, and in seven intraoperative electrocorticography alone was performed. The mean follow-up period for the group was 3.5 years (minimum 30 months in all cases). All 20 patients in whom MSTs were performed in the primary motor cortex experienced transient hemiparesis (mild in 12 and moderate in eight) lasting up to 6 weeks; however, no patient suffered a permanent motor deficit in the long-term follow-up period. In 26 patients who underwent cortical resections followed by MSTs, 12 (46%) were seizure free (Engel Class I) following surgery. Eleven patients (42%) (Engel Classes II and III) continued to suffer seizures but improvement in seizure control was adequate following surgery. In the 23 patients in whom subdural grids were placed to capture the ictal onset zone by invasive video-electroencephalography, MSTs comprised a mean of 37% of the surgically treated area under the grid. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this series demonstrate that MSTs can be performed with acceptable morbidity in children undergoing epilepsy surgery. The precise role of MSTs in controlling seizure frequency and outcome, especially when combined with planned cortical resections, awaits further study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurosurgery PediatricsSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207