Dysregulated Inflammatory Response to<i>Candida albicans</i>in a C5-Deficient Mouse Strain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Experimental infection of inbred mouse strains with Candida albicans provides a good model system to identify host genetic determinants that regulate onset of, response to, and ultimate outcome of disseminated candidiasis. The A/J mouse strain is exquisitely sensitive to infection with C. albicans, while the C57BL/6J strain is relatively resistant, as measured by survival following intravenous injection of Candida blastospores. This differential susceptibility is caused by an A/J-specific loss-of-function mutation in the C5 component of the complement pathway. C5 plays several critical roles in host response to infection, including target lysis and phagocyte recruitment. Therefore, to determine which of its functions were required for host resistance to candidiasis, a detailed comparative analysis of pathophysiology and host response to acute C. albicans infection was conducted in A/J and C57BL/6J mice. C5-sufficient C57BL/6J mice were found to succumb late in infection due to severe kidney pathology, typified by fungal replication and robust neutrophil-based inflammatory response associated with extensive tissue damage. In contrast, A/J mice were moribund within 24 h postinfection but displayed little if any kidney damage despite an inability to mobilize granulocytes and a high fungal load in the kidney. Rather, C5 deficiency in A/J mice was associated with higher levels of circulating cytokines tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-6, monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1), MCP-5, and eotaxin in response to C. albicans. Transfer of the C5-defective allele from A/J onto a C57BL/6J genetic background in recombinant congenic strain BcA17 recapitulated the phenotypic aspects of the susceptibility of A/J mice to C. albicans, confirming the causative role of C5 deficiency in the dysregulated cytokine response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".