Serum Interleukin 9 Levels Are Increased in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis: Association with Lower Frequency and Severity of Pulmonary Fibrosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine serum interleukin 9 (IL-9) levels and their clinical associations in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: Serum IL-9 levels were examined by ELISA in 71 patients with SSc, 15 with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 15 with dermatomyositis (DM), 39 with atopic dermatitis, and 28 healthy individuals. RESULTS: Serum IL-9 levels were significantly elevated in SSc patients (84.6 ± 76.0 pg/ml) compared with healthy individuals (40.4 ± 41.7 pg/ml; p < 0.001), and patients with SLE (50.7 ± 52.0 pg/ml; p < 0.05) or DM (50.6 ± 55.8 pg/ml; p < 0.05) or atopic dermatitis (41.8 ± 38.8 pg/ml; p < 0.001). Among SSc patients, there were no differences in serum IL-9 levels between those with limited cutaneous SSc and those with diffuse cutaneous SSc. Patients with SSc and raised IL-9 levels less often had pulmonary fibrosis and decreased percentage vital capacity than those with normal IL-9 levels. IL-9 levels were positively correlated with percentage vital capacity in patients with SSc. CONCLUSION: Serum IL-9 level was increased in patients with SSc, and was associated with lower frequency and severity of pulmonary fibrosis in SSc. IL-9 could be a protective factor against the development of pulmonary fibrosis in this disease, and as such would be a possible therapeutic target.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".