MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Test-retest reliability of the sport concussion assessment tool 2 (SCAT2) for uninjured children and young adults

2013· article· en· W2128716419 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mónica Chan, Jannick Vicky Vielleuse, Stephanie Vokaty, Matthew Ari Wener, Isabelle Pearson, Isabelle Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Sports Medicine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsMontreal Children's HospitalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntraclass correlationConcussionPhysical therapyBalance (ability)MedicineTest (biology)Reliability (semiconductor)Poison controlInjury preventionPsychologyPsychometricsClinical psychologyMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To establish test-retest reliability of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 2 (SCAT2) in healthy elementary school children and young adults. Design Repeated-measures design. Setting Elementary Schools in the Montreal area (children) and McGill University Athletics Department (adults). Participants Twenty-two children (14 females and eight males; mean age 10.3±0.5 years) and 73 young adults (42 female, 31 males; mean age 22.6±1.8 years) from University students participated in this study. Intervention None. Main Outcome Measurements Participants were tested using the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-2 (SCAT2) on two occasions, 1-week apart (6.4±2.7 days). The SCAT2 measures several domains of functioning such as delayed memory, balance and post-concussion symptoms. Test-retest reliability was assessed for the total SCAT2 score as well as for the SCAT2 components separately. Results Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for the total SCAT2 score were only fair for both groups of participants (ICC=0.367 for young adults and 0.446 for children). The ICCs were also below 0.5 for individual components of the SCAT2 in young adults. In children, individual components yielded better reliability than the total score (Balance ICC=0.725; SAC ICC=0.523; symptom severity ICC=0.488). Conclusions The results indicate that in view of the low levels of test-retest reliability achieved for the total SCAT2 score, professionals should be cautious when using change in score over time for clinical decisions. Recommending the use of the SCAT2 as a standard of care to diagnose a concussion or to ascertain recovery from one may be premature at this time. Acknowledgments Participants and their families, The Priory School, Gardenview Elementary School for allowing testing within their institutions, Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy McGill University. Competing interests None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Sports MedicineSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207