Population genetic structure of the snow crab (<i>Chionoecetes opilio</i>) at the Northwest Atlantic scale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Marine species with planktonic larval durations of several months (teleplanic larvae) can potentially maintain demographic connectivity across large geographical distances. This perspective has important fundamental and applied implications, notably for the understanding of evolutionary and ecological processes in the marine realm, the implementation of marine protected areas, and fisheries management. Here we present, at the scale of the Northwest Atlantic, a spatial analysis of snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio, Majoidea) population genetic structure, a species that has a planktonic larval phase of 3 to 5 months. Eight microsatellite markers analysed on 847 C. opilio samples from 13 locations revealed an absence of significant genetic structure along the west coast of Greenland and within Atlantic Canada from southern Labrador to Nova Scotia. These results are consistent with a scenario of extensive demographic connectivity among C. opilio populations and have implications for the management of this species, which supports one of the most important Canadian and Greenlandic fisheries in terms of economic value. A genetic break is nevertheless identified between Greenland and Atlantic Canada, showing that genetic structure can develop within seas (the Labrador Sea in this case) despite the occurrence of very long planktonic larval stages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".