PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN BASED PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING: ACCUMULATING EVIDENCE OF EFFICACY BUT PERSISTENT UNCERTAINTY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessJournal of UrologyEditorials1 Aug 2005PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN BASED PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING: ACCUMULATING EVIDENCE OF EFFICACY BUT PERSISTENT UNCERTAINTY Gerald L. Andriole Gerald L. AndrioleGerald L. Andriole More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000171051.35187.d0AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN BASED PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING: ACCUMULATING EVIDENCE OF EFFICACY BUT PERSISTENT UNCERTAINTY." The Journal of Urology, 174(2), pp. 413–414 References 1 Crawford, E. D., Chia, D., Andriole, G. L., Redding, D., Gelmann, E. P., Gohagan, J. K. et al: PSA testing interval reduction in screening intervals: data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer (PLCO) screening trial. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2002, abstract 4, 2002 Google Scholar 2 : Recommended prostate-specific antigen testing intervals for the detection of curable prostate cancer. JAMA1997; 177: 1475. Google Scholar 3 : Prostate cancer mortality after introduction of prostate-specific antigen mass screening in the Federal State of Tyrol, Austria. Urology2001; 58: 417. Google Scholar 4 : Screening decreases prostate cancer death: first analysis of the 1988 Quebec prospective randomized controlled trial. The Prostate1999; 38: 83. Google Scholar 5 : Case-control study of screening for prostatic cancer by digital rectal examinations. Lancet1991; 337: 1526. Google Scholar 6 : Screening digital rectal examination and prostate cancer mortality: a case-control study. J Med Screen1998; 5: 99. Google Scholar 7 : Prostate biopsy following a positive screen in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. J Urol2005; 173: 746. Link, Google Scholar 8 : Prostate Cancer Screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial: findings from the initial screening round of a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst2005; 97: 433. Google Scholar Division of Urologic Surgery; Washington University School of Medicine; St. Louis, Missouri© 2005 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 174Issue 2August 2005Page: 413-414 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2005 by American Urological Association, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Gerald L. Andriole More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.092 | 0.306 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".