Response of understory plant community of boreal mixedwood stands to fire, logging, and spruce budworm outbreak
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The understory plant community of 63 boreal mixedwood stands in southeastern Manitoba, Canada, that were disturbed in the 1980s (21 by crown fire, 20 by logging, and 22 by severe spruce budworm ( Choristoneura fumiferana ) outbreak) were investigated. Understory plant communities that developed after fire, logging, and spruce budworm outbreak shared a large number of species (47 out of 81 identified). However, compared with fire and spruce budworm outbreak, logging promoted the rapid expansion of tall shrubs (52.7% vs. 17.2% and 29.75% coverage, respectively), particularly Corylus cornuta . Significant differences were also found between disturbance types when species coverage was compared on the basis of shade tolerance and regeneration strategy. Lower shrub coverage following fire is attributed to greater disturbance severity on the forest floor, affecting in situ propagules and competition from dense trembling aspen ( Populus tremuloides Michx.) regeneration. Lower shrub coverage following spruce budworm outbreak is attributed to slow opening of the canopy coupled with retention of a residual canopy of nonhost trees. Uniformly high shrub coverage following logging resulted in less heterogeneity and lower species diversity at both the stand and the disturbance level compared with natural disturbances. High shrub coverage may negatively impact conifer recruitment and have significant implications for future stand composition and productivity. Consideration of a natural insect outbreak model, rather than fire, for management of boreal mixedwood stands is recommended, particularly if stands are to be left to regenerate naturally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".