Plasma Stromal Cell–Derived Factor-1: Host Derived Marker Predictive of Distant Metastasis in Breast Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Homing of breast cancer cells to metastatic sites may be regulated by the production of stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1 by specific target organs, which attracts CXCR4-expressing breast cancer cells. We investigated the value of SDF-1 as a predictive blood marker of distant metastasis in breast cancer, together with a common polymorphism of SDF-1, SDF-1-3'A. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Plasma samples were collected prospectively for 270 consecutive primary breast cancer patients with a median follow-up of 3.3 years. Plasma SDF-1 levels were measured using an ELISA, and the polymorphism was identified via PCR-RFLP analysis. RESULTS: Plasma SDF-1 levels were divided into two groups, low and high, based on the median SDF-1 value of 2,661 pg/mL. Patients with low SDF-1 showed an increased risk of developing distant metastasis (relative risk, 1.94; P = 0.02) and poorer breast cancer-specific survival [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR), 3.92; P = 0.007]. Patients with both low plasma SDF-1 levels and the SDF-1-3'A polymorphism showed a poorer breast cancer-specific survival (AHR, 3.98; P = 0.001) and distant disease-free survival (AHR, 2.88; P = 0.003). In a separate cohort of 22 breast cancer patients, we found no significant difference in SDF-1 levels before and posttumor resection. CONCLUSION: We found that low plasma SDF-1 is an independent host-derived predictive marker of distant metastasis in breast cancer. The prognostic value of the combination of a low plasma SDF-1 level and the SDF-1-3'A polymorphism identifies a cohort of patients with an intrinsic susceptibility for poorer survival.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".