MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128864274 · doi:10.1177/0309324713477638

A numerical method for elasto-plastic notch-root stress–strain analysis

2013· article· en· W2128864274 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFatigue and fracture mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodStructural engineeringStress (linguistics)Stress–strain curveMaterials scienceNonlinear systemDeformation (meteorology)Strain (injury)Linear elasticityPlasticityComposite materialEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, a computational modeling method of the multiaxial stress–strain notch analysis has been developed to compute elasto-plastic notch-tip stress–strain responses using linear elastic finite element results of notched components. Application and validation of the multiaxial stress–strain notch analysis model were presented by comparing computed results of the model to the experimental data of SAE 1070 steel notched shaft subjected to several nonproportional load paths. Based on the comparison between the experimental and computed strain histories, the elasto-plastic stress–strain model predicted notch strains with reasonable accuracy using linear elastic finite element stress histories. The elasto-plastic stress–strain notch analysis model provides an efficient and simple analysis method preferable to expensive experimental component tests and more complex and time-consuming incremental nonlinear finite element analysis. The elasto-plastic stress–strain model can thus be employed to perform fatigue life and fatigue damage estimates associated with the local material deformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.797
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it