MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128878465 · doi:10.1139/v06-166

Reactions of α-isobutyl-α-(methylthio)methylene Meldrum's acid with primary amines in aqueous DMSO

2006· article· en· W2128878465 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Supriya Biswas, Mahammad Ali, Zvi Rappoport, Hatim Salim

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Reaction Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryAminolysisAmine gas treatingMethyleneMedicinal chemistryNucleophileAqueous solutionLeaving groupOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aminolysis of α-isobutyl-α-(methylthio)methylene Meldrum's acid 7 with primary amines, namely, n-butylamine, glycinamide, and methoxyethylamine in DMSO–H 2 O (50:50, v/v) at 20 °C is overall second-order but first-order in both 7 and amines. The reaction with aminoacetonitrile (AA) is overall third-order, first-order in substrate, and second-order in amine at low amine concentration, while at high amine concentration and high pH the dependence on amine is first-order. A general three-step mechanism has been proposed for all these reactions. For the former group of amines, the first step is a rate-limiting attack of the amine to form the tetrahedral intermediate (T A ± ), followed by a fast acid–base equilibrium and a fast RNH 3 + - or H 2 O-assisted leaving group expulsion. For AA, general base catalysis was confirmed from the dependence of k A on [AA] f and on [OH – ]. For all four amines, a good Brønsted plot of log k 1 vs. pK a AH in DMSO–H 2 O (50:50, v/v) with β nuc = 0.34 ± 0.02 was observed. These observations are consistent with the suggested mechanism.Key words: nucleophilic vinylic substitution reactions, primary amines, α-isobutyl-α-(methylthio)methylene Meldrum's acid, three-step mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicChemical Reaction MechanismsFrench-language works237,207