Impact of Education and Support on the Tolerability and Quality of Life in a Cohort of HIV-1 Infected Patients Treated With Enfuvirtide (SURCOUF Study)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of life and the intensity of the injection site reactions during the first 6 months of treatment with enfuvirtide according to the counseling and training provided by nurses and physicians. In this prospective, 6-month cohort, 61 HIV-1 infected adult patients starting enfuvirtide have been included. At baseline, 82% of the patients have either read information documents (23%) or received counseling (59%); 18% were self-injectors, 27.8% had a dual disposition (self-injector + third person), and 49.2% were injected by a third person. At month 6, among the 43 patients still on enfuvirtide, 59% have had no change in injection disposition, and 52% have the dual disposition. Quality of life and enfuvirtide acceptance improved during 6 months. With adequate education and choice of injection dispositions, treatment with enfuvirtide can lead to quality-of-life improvements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".