A Comparison of the Antioxidant Properties and Total Phenolic Content in a Diatom, Chaetoceros sp. and a Green Microalga, Nannochloropsis sp.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aquaculture industry commonly makes use of microalgae as live feed. Chaetoceros sp., a diatom, andNannochloropsis sp., a unicellular green microalga, have both been reported to contain a substantial amount ofpolyunsaturated fatty acids and carotenoids. Their potential as natural sources of antioxidants has gained recentattention. This study focuses on determining the antioxidant properties of the different solvent extracts, namelyhexane, dichloromethane, chloroform and methanol, from both microalgae. The evaluation of antioxidantcapacities was done by Folin-ciocalteu, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical-scavenging, metal chelating,nitro-blue tetrazolium reduction and ferric-reducing antioxidant power assay. Results showed that the non-polarsolvent extracts from the diatom were highest in antioxidant power, whereas both polar and non-polar solventextracts of green microalgae showed good antioxidant potential. In general, Chaetoceros sp. had higherantioxidant capacities than Nannochloropsis sp. This study suggests that different solvent extracts containdifferent potential antioxidant compounds able to scavenge different types of free radicals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it