Finding off‐diagonal entries of the inverse of a large symmetric sparse matrix
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY The method fast inverse using nested dissection (FIND) was proposed to calculate the diagonal entries of the inverse of a large sparse symmetric matrix. In this paper, we show how the FIND algorithm can be generalized to calculate off‐diagonal entries of the inverse that correspond to ‘short’ geometric distances within the computational mesh of the original matrix. The idea is to extend the downward pass in FIND that eliminates all nodes outside of each node cluster. In our advanced downwards pass, it eliminates all nodes outside of each ‘node cluster pair’ from a subset of all node cluster pairs. The complexity depends on how far ( i , j ) is from the main diagonal. In the extension of the algorithm, all entries of the inverse that correspond to vertex pairs that are geometrically closer than a predefined length limit l will be calculated. More precisely, let α be the total number of nodes in a two‐dimensional square mesh. We will show that our algorithm can compute O ( α 3 ∕ 2 + 2 ε ) entries of the inverse in O ( α 3 ∕ 2 + 2 ε ) time where l = O ( α 1 ∕ 4 + ε ) and 0 ≤ ε ≤ 1 ∕ 4. Numerical examples are given to illustrate the efficiency of the proposed method. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it