Finding off‐diagonal entries of the inverse of a large symmetric sparse matrix
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY The method fast inverse using nested dissection (FIND) was proposed to calculate the diagonal entries of the inverse of a large sparse symmetric matrix. In this paper, we show how the FIND algorithm can be generalized to calculate off‐diagonal entries of the inverse that correspond to ‘short’ geometric distances within the computational mesh of the original matrix. The idea is to extend the downward pass in FIND that eliminates all nodes outside of each node cluster. In our advanced downwards pass, it eliminates all nodes outside of each ‘node cluster pair’ from a subset of all node cluster pairs. The complexity depends on how far (i,j) is from the main diagonal. In the extension of the algorithm, all entries of the inverse that correspond to vertex pairs that are geometrically closer than a predefined length limit l will be calculated. More precisely, let α be the total number of nodes in a two‐dimensional square mesh. We will show that our algorithm can compute O(α3 ∕ 2 + 2ε) entries of the inverse in O(α3 ∕ 2 + 2ε) time where l = O(α1 ∕ 4 + ε) and 0 ≤ ε ≤1 ∕ 4. Numerical examples are given to illustrate the efficiency of the proposed method. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".