MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of an integrated care programme on re‐hospitalization of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2012· article· en· W2129071267 on OpenAlex
Grégory Moullec, Kim Lavoie, Khalil Rabhi, Marcel Julien, Hélène Favreau, Manon Labrecque

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueRespirology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart InstituteUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité de MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineCOPDOdds ratioConfidence intervalLogistic regressionRetrospective cohort studyMedical recordDisease managementEmergency medicineEmergency departmentPulmonary diseaseCohortPhysical therapyIntervention (counseling)DiseaseInternal medicinePediatricsNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Hospital admissions due to exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have a major impact on disease progression and costs. We hypothesized that a 1-year integrated care (IC) programme comprising two components (patient-centred education+case management) would be effective in preventing COPD-related hospitalizations. METHODS: This was a retrospective longitudinal cohort study. Data were retrieved both from an administrative database in the province of Quebec (Canada), and from the medical records at two hospitals in Montreal. One hundred and eighty-nine COPD patients were randomly selected from registers at these centres, from 2004 to 2006. Patients in the intervention group underwent a programme comprising two components: patient -centred education-involving three group sessions of self-management education that included one motivational interview and instruction in the use of a written action plan; and case management-involving scheduled follow-up visits with access to a call centre. The intervention group was compared with a group receiving usual care (UC). The main outcome was COPD-related re-hospitalizations, with length of hospital stay and emergency department (ED) visits being secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis with adjustment for covariates showed that there was a lower probability of re-hospitalization over the follow-up year in the IC group compared with the UC group (odds ratio 0.44; 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.85). Subgroup analyses revealed that the IC programme prevented more COPD-related hospitalizations in women compared with men. There were no significant between-group differences in length of hospital stay or number of ED visits. CONCLUSIONS: An IC programme combining self-management education and case-management can decrease rates of COPD-related hospitalizations, particularly among women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.771

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it