MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129090621 · doi:10.2174/1566523053544272

Adenovirus-mediated Transgene-engineered Dendritic Cell Vaccine of Cancer

2005· review· en· W2129090621 on OpenAlexaff
Qiaohua Wu, Dajing Xia, Svein A. Carlsen, Jim Xiang

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Gene Therapy · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Cancer AgencyDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntigenGene deliveryEx vivoViral vectorBiologyDendritic cellGenetic enhancementVirologyVector (molecular biology)TransgeneAntigen-presenting cellT cellImmunotherapyIn vivoImmunologyImmune systemGeneRecombinant DNAGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dendritic cells (DCs) are the most effective antigen presenting cells (APCs) to elicit both primary and secondary T-cell response that is critical for antitumor immunity and elimination of intracellular pathogens. Therefore, DCs pulsed ex vivo with antigens have the potential used as cell-based vaccines against tumors. Viral vectors derived from adenoviruses have been extensively used to pulse DCs ex vivo by delivering genes encoding immunomodulatory molecules and tumor antigens to DCs since these vectors are relatively safe, effective in inducing the maturation of DCs, and can accommodate large expression cassettes encoding antigens. One of the hurdles for gene delivery to DCs by adenovirus (Ad) vectors, however, is low transfection efficiency of DCs due to the paucity of Ad receptor on DCs. To overcome this obstacle, targeted Ad vectors have been made by modifying viral capsid proteins. These targeted Ad vectors not only enhance the gene delivery to DCs, but also allow in vivo gene delivery to DCs, thus avoiding ex vivo manipulation of DCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Gene TherapySame topicVirus-based gene therapy researchFrench-language works237,207