Key characters uniting hemichordates and chordates: homologies or homoplasies?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Four chordate characters — dorsal hollow nerve cord, notochord, gill slits, and endostyle — are compared morphologically, molecularly, and functionally with similar structures in hemichordates to assess their putative homologies. The dorsal hollow nerve cord and enteropneust neurocord are probably homoplasies. The neurocord (= collar cord) may be an autapomorphy of Enteropneusta that innervates a unique pair of muscles, the perihemal coelomic muscles. Despite the apparent lack of organ-level homology, chordates and enteropneusts share a common pattern of neurulation that preserves a "contact innervation" between neuro- and myo-epithelia, which may be the primitive deuterostome pattern of neuromuscular innervation. The chordate notochord and hemichordate stomochord are probably homoplasies. Other potential notochord antecedents in hemichordates are examined, but no clear homolog is identified. The comparative morphology of notochords suggests that the "stack-of-coins" developmental stage, retained into adulthood only by cephalochordates, is the plesiomorphic notochord form. Hemichordate and chordate gill slits are probably homologs, but only at the level of simple ciliated circular or oval pores, lacking a skeleton, as occur in adults of Cephalodiscus spp., developmentally in some enteropneusts, and in many urochordates. Functional morphology, I125-binding experiments, and genetic data suggest that endostylar function may reside in the entire pharyngeal lining of Enteropneusta and is not restricted to a specialized midline structure as in chordates. A cladistic analysis of Deuterostomia, based partly on homologs discussed in this paper, indicates a sister-taxon relationship between Urochordata and Vertebrata, with Cephalochordata as the plesiomorphic clade.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".