Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors constrict the fetal lamb ductus arteriosus both in vitro and in vivo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nonselective cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors are potent tocolytic agents; however, they also have adverse fetal effects such as constriction of the fetal ductus arteriosus. Recently, selective COX-2 inhibitors have been used in the management of preterm labor in the hope of avoiding fetal complications. However, both COX-1 and -2 are expressed by cells of the ductus arteriosus. We used fetal lambs (0.88 gestation) to assess the ability of selective COX-2 inhibitors celecoxib and NS398 to affect the ductus arteriosus. Both selective COX-2 inhibitors decreased PGE(2) and 6ketoPGF(1alpha) production in vitro; both inhibitors constricted the isolated ductus in vitro. The nonselective COX-1/COX-2 inhibitor indomethacin produced a further reduction in PG release and an additional increase in ductus tension in vitro. We used a prodrug of celecoxib to achieve 1.4 +/- 0.6 microg/ml, mean +/- standard deviation, of the active drug in vivo. This concentration of celecoxib produced both an increase in pressure gradient and resistance across the ductus; celecoxib also decreased fetal plasma concentrations of PGE(2) and 6ketoPGF(1alpha). Indomethacin (0.7 +/- 0.2 microg/ml) produced a significantly greater fall in ductus blood flow than celecoxib and tended to have a greater effect on ductus resistence in vivo. We conclude that caution should be used when recommending COX-2 inhibitors for use in pregnant women, because COX-2 appears to play a significant role in maintaining patency of the fetal ductus arteriosus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".