MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129178154 · doi:10.1136/jmg.38.4.249

Identification of two novel mutations in the <i>CACNA1A</i> gene responsible for episodic ataxia type 2

2001· letter· en· W2129178154 on OpenAlexaff
Kylie A. Scoggan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Genetics · 2001
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChannelopathyFamilial hemiplegic migraineMissense mutationCerebellar ataxiaAtaxiaGeneticsProgressive myoclonus epilepsyMutationSpinocerebellar ataxiaCerebellumBiologyEndocrinologyInternal medicineMedicineNeuroscienceMigraine with auraGeneMigraine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Editor—Episodic ataxia type 2 (EA-2) (OMIM 108500) is an autosomal dominant neurological disorder. Affected subjects experience discrete episodes of cerebellar ataxia usually associated with migraine symptoms, interictal nystagmus, as well as residual mild and, in some cases, a progressive cerebellar incoordination. These attacks usually begin in childhood or adolescence, last a few hours, may be precipitated by stress, exercise, or fatigue, and respond to acetazolamide.1-3 As with other acetazolamide responsive diseases, EA-2 is a channelopathy.4 It was first linked to chromosome 19p133 5-7 and subsequently shown to be allelic to familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM) when mutations for both disorders were identified in the P/Q type calcium channel α1Asubunit gene, CACNA1A .8 Shortly thereafter, an intragenic expansion of a CAG repeat within CACNA1A was shown to cause spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 (SCA6).9 To date, mutations causing EA-2 all appear to disrupt the translational reading frame of the α1A subunit gene,8 10-12 while those causing FHM all seem to be missense mutations.8 13-15 A single missense mutation, however, in the CACNA1A gene has also been shown to cause severe progressive cerebellar ataxia.16 The α1A subunit has been shown to be the pore forming unit of the P/Q type calcium channel17 18 which is involved in controlling neurotransmitter release19 and is expressed throughout the brain with abundant expression in the cerebellum.20-22 This high voltage activated calcium channel consists of five subunits, α1A, β4, α2, δ, and γ. The α1A subunit is subdivided into four homologous domains (DI-DIV) that each contain six putative transmembrane regions (S1-S6) (fig 1).19 The fourth transmembrane domain functions as the voltage sensor while the four loops between transmembrane domains S5-S6 compose the pore …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical GeneticsSame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207