Design optimization of a next generation Yottabit-per-second network
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper deals with the design of a new proposed optical core transport network called the YottaWeb, which offers information delivery at rates thousand of times those of today's Internet. The YottaWeh is based upon the concept of agile cores of a previous named PetaWeb architecture that provides direct optical paths between electronically controlled edge nodes. A fundamental question is how to arrange the edge nodes around the agile cores into a suitable and efficient YottaWeb that could gracefully expand as demand increases, while considering the mean hop value weighted by the demand, as the main performance measure. Based on the proposal to create a multidimensional lattice structure of agile cores, we review previous algorithms proposed for the resultant highly combinatorial problem. Next, we propose a MetaSearch procedure based on Tabu Search and VNS. The performance of this procedure is assessed using a set of networks with random chaotic traffic. Comparative results will be discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it