MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129335174 · doi:10.1353/jmh.2006.0264

One of the Boys: Homosexuality in the Military During World War II (review)

2006· article· en· W2129335174 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ryan O’Connor

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Military History · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomosexualityMasculinityLesbianWorld War IIGender studiesSociologySodomyHistoryPsychologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: One of the Boys: Homosexuality in the Military During World War II Ryan O’Connor One of the Boys: Homosexuality in the Military During World War II. By Paul Jackson. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2004. ISBN 0-7735-2772-9. Photographs. Illustrations. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Pp. x, 338. $27.95. Paul Jackson's One of the Boys examines the experience of homosexual Canadian servicemen during the Second World War. Based on the analysis of court martial records, as well as numerous interviews with former servicemen, this is no mere rehashing of the story already told in Paul Bérubé's Coming Out under Fire: The History of Gay Men and Women in World War Two. Besides the most obvious difference, that Jackson studied Canadian soldiers and Bérubé Americans, there are a number of interpretative differences between the works, most notably Bérubé's portrayal of his subjects "as coherently gay and lesbian actors" (p. 21), whereas Jackson provides an all-encompassing definition of homosexuality "as the ability to derive sexual pleasure from members of one's own sex" (p. 148). Beginning with a review of official military policy regarding homosexual soldiers, the author demonstrates that there was a deeply-rooted fear of homosexuality within the military hierarchy. Based on the belief that homosexuality was a sign of moral weakness and a lack of masculinity, it followed that such individuals should be kept out of the services, for fear that their presence might have a ruinous effect upon soldiers' morale. There was a wide divergence, however, between official policy and practice. Soldiers identified by their officers as homosexual tended to be left alone, provided they were accepted by their fellow soldiers. More often than not, Jackson argues, such was the case. When soldiers within a given unit could not reconcile themselves to the presence of a homosexual serviceman, the latter tended to be transferred to a more hospitable unit. [End Page 1174] While there was a tendency to protect homosexual servicemen from official disciplining, those unlucky enough to face court martial underwent a humiliating process. Utilized in an effort to not only punish the accused but also to deter others from following in their footsteps, such court martials featured denigrating language intended to denormalize the same-sex experience. Those found guilty were subsequently sent to jail, and more often than not placed under suicide watch—a clear testament to the stigmatization of being labeled a homosexual during this period. Jackson's is an important contribution, not only for those interested in wartime Canada and the social history of World War II, but also those with an eye for contemporary public policy debates. Those campaigning against the presence of homosexuals within the military continue to argue that their presence lowers the troops' morale. According to this case study, homosexuality tended to be accepted within the ranks; rather, it was when the hierarchy attempted to root out homosexuals that esprit de corps was negatively affected. A well-researched and thought provoking book, One of the Boys deserves a wide readership. Ryan O’Connor University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada Copyright © 2006 Society for Military History

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Military HistorySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207