MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129398635 · doi:10.5194/acp-9-8173-2009

Equatorial transport as diagnosed from nitrous oxide variability

2009· article· en· W2129398635 on OpenAlexfundno aff
P. Ricaud, Jean‐Pierre Pommereau, J.‐L. Attié, É. Le Flochmoën, L. El Amraoui, H. Teyssèdre, Vincent‐Henri Peuch, Wuhu Feng, Martyn P. Chipperfield

Bibliographic record

VenueAtmospheric chemistry and physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Space AgencyNational Centre for Earth ObservationNatural Environment Research CouncilCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueTekesEuropean Commission
KeywordsStratosphereTroposphereAtmospheric sciencesClimatologyUpwellingEnvironmental scienceAnnual cycleDiabaticForcing (mathematics)RadiometerGeologyOceanographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The mechanisms of transport on annual, semi-annual and quasi-biennial time scales in the equatorial (10° S–10° N) stratosphere are investigated using the nitrous oxide (N2O) measurements of the space-borne ODIN Sub-Millimetre Radiometer from November 2001 to June 2005, and the simulations of the three-dimensional chemical transport models MOCAGE and SLIMCAT. Both models are forced with analyses from the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecast, but the vertical transport is derived either from the forcing analyses by solving the continuity equation (MOCAGE), or from diabatic heating rates using a radiation scheme (SLIMCAT). The N2O variations in the mid-to-upper stratosphere at levels above 32 hPa are generally well captured by the models though significant differences appear with the observations as well as between the models, attributed to the difficulty of capturing correctly the slow upwelling associated with the Brewer-Dobson circulation. However, in the lower stratosphere, below 32 hPa, the observed variations are shown to be mainly seasonal with peak amplitude at 400–450 K (~17.5–19 km), totally missed by the models. The minimum N2O in June, out of phase by two months with the known minimum seasonal upwelling associated with the Brewer-Dobson circulation and moreover amplified over the Western Pacific compared to Africa is incompatible with the seasonal change of upwelling evoked to explain the O3 annual cycle in the same altitude range (Randel et al., 2007). Unless the 1.5 ppbv amplitude of N2O annual cycle in the upper troposphere is totally wrong, the explanation of the observed N2O annual cycle of 15 ppbv in the lower stratosphere requires another mechanism. A possible candidate for that might be the existence of a downward time-averaged mass flux above specific regions, as shown by Sherwood (2000) over Indonesia, required for compensating the energy sink resulting from the deep overshooting of cold and heavy air at high altitude over intense convective areas. But, since global models do currently not capture this subsidence, it must be recognised that a full explanation of the observations cannot be provided for the moment. However, the coincidence of the peak contrast between the Western Pacific and Africa with the maximum overshooting volume in May reported by the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Precipitation Radar, suggests a strong influence of deep convection on the chemical composition of the tropical lower stratosphere up to 500 K (21 km).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtmospheric chemistry and physicsSame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207