Keto, thione, selone, and tellone carotenoids — Changing antioxidants to antireductants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heterocarotenoids can be considered as xenobiotic compounds as they are foreign to living organisms. Thione carotenoids are heterocarotenoids that are particularly interesting because the presence of sulfur shifted the absorption to longer wavelengths than the corresponding keto carotenoids. This may be important for further applications such as the development of new pigments. Keto carotenoids are well-known antiradical molecules, however, nothing is known about heterocarotenoids acting as free radical scavengers. Thus, the main goal of this investigation is to study the antiradical properties of some heterocarotenoids, such as thione, selone, and tellone carotenoids. For this purpose, the energy differences between singlets and triplets are used to analyze the singlet oxygen quenching mechanism, and the electron transfer mechanism is investigated, taking into account that these may constitute antiradical molecules either donating or accepting electrons (antioxidants or antireductants). To analyze these mechanisms, vertical ionization energy (I), vertical electron affinity (A), and electrodonating (χ − ) and electroaccepting (χ + ) electronegativities were evaluated by applying density functional theory calculations. The investigated heterocarotenoids are as effective as keto carotenoids in terms of being either electron donors or acceptors, and therefore, they have a similar capacity for scavenging free radicals. Changing the C=O group to C=S, C=Se, or C=Te converts an antioxidant to an antireductant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".