Bacterial diversity of soil samples from the western Himalayas, India
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-altitude cold habitats of the Himalayas are little explored with respect to bacterial diversity. Diverse bacterial species and phylotypes obtained by culture-dependent and culture-independent approaches are reported here. Phylogenetic analysis and modulation of bacterial diversity with altitude and available organic carbon content are also described. Psychrophilic and psychrotolerant bacteria dominated the Himalayan habitats, accounting for 60% of the cultivated strains. Isolates produced one or more (up to five) hydrolytic enzymes, lipase being the one secreted by most strains (62%). Partial 16S rRNA gene sequences were obtained for 99 bacterial strains and 74 clones obtained from soil samples from the western Himalayas. Forty-five percent of cultured bacterial strains belonged to the Proteobacteria group with 39% belonging to gamma-Proteobacteria. Firmicutes was the second most abundant class with 32% of the total isolates followed by Actinobacteria (16%) and Bacteroidetes (6%). Most of the strains belonged to the genus Bacillus (30%) followed by Pseudomonas (24%) and Arthrobacter (12%). In culture-independent studies, phylotypes belonging to the Proteobacteria were dominant (73%) with the majority being beta-Proteobacteria (31%). The bacterial diversity exhibited an altitude gradient with a gradual decline in the number of genera with increase in altitude. The isolates exhibited close phylogenetic affinities to bacteria from other cold habitats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".