MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129504146 · doi:10.3109/10428194.2014.951848

Single nucleotide polymorphisms in non-coding region of the glucocorticoid receptor gene and prednisone response in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

2015· article· en· W2129504146 on OpenAlexaff
Xue Lu, Chunhuai Li, Yue Wang, Wei Sun, Cui Ma, Yongyan He, Yongli Yu, Lu Cai, Liying Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueLeukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsEducation and Early Childhood Development
FundersFirst Hospital of Jilin University
KeywordsPrednisoneSingle-nucleotide polymorphismHaplotypeOdds ratioAlleleGlucocorticoidMedicineGlucocorticoid receptorInternal medicineOncologyGeneGeneticsBiologyImmunologyGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poor prednisone response predicts an inferior outcome in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM) treatment protocols. Here, we investigated five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in both the coding and non-coding regions of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) gene, and analyzed their association with prednisone responsiveness in vivo in 63 pediatric patients with ALL in China. Of the five SNPs, the rs41423247 and rs7701443 polymorphisms were significantly associated with prednisone response at the allelic level (rs41423247 odds ratio [OR] = 9.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23-74.21; p = 0.01; rs7701443 OR = 3.12; 95% CI: 1.08-9; p = 0.02). Two polymorphisms (rs6189/6190 and rs6198) were not observed in the study cohort. Haplotypes composed of CCC alleles and TCG alleles at three loci (rs7701443, Tth111I and BclI) were both associated with prednisone response (p = 0.013; p = 0.028). Our results suggested that polymorphisms in the non-coding region of the GR gene were associated with prednisone response in vivo in pediatric ALL in Han Chinese.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLeukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphomaSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207