Functional Analysis of the Noncoding Regions of the Uukuniemi Virus ( <i>Bunyaviridae</i> ) RNA Segments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The role of the variable portion of the noncoding regions (NCRs) of the three Bunyaviridae RNA segments (L, M, S) in transcription, replication, and packaging was studied using the recently developed plasmid-driven RNA polymerase I minigenome system for Uukuniemi (UUK) virus, genus Phlebovirus (11), as a model. Comparison of the different segments showed that all NCRs were sufficient to mediate transcription/replication of a minigenome but demonstrated decreased promoter strength in the order M > L > S. Chimeric minigenomes with flanking NCRs from different genome segments revealed that the number of total base pairs within the inverted, partially complementary ends was important for transcription and replication. Point mutations increasing the base-pairing potential produced increased reporter expression, indicating that complementarity between the 5' and 3' ends is crucial for promoter activity. The role of the intergenic region (IGR) located between the two open reading frames of the ambisense UUK virus S segment was analyzed by inserting this sequence element downstream of the reporter genes. The presence of the IGR was found to enhance reporter expression, demonstrating that efficient transcription termination, regulated by the IGR, is important for optimal minigenome mRNA translation. Finally, genome packaging efficacy varied for different NCRs and was strongest for L followed by M and S. Strong reporter gene activity was still observed after seven consecutive cell culture passages, indicating a selective rather than random genome-packaging mechanism. In summary, our results demonstrate that the NCRs from all three segments contain the necessary signals to initiate transcription and replication as well as packaging. Based on promoter strength, M-segment NCRs may be the preferred choice for the development of reverse genetics and minigenome rescue systems for bunyaviruses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".