Functional Analysis of the Noncoding Regions of the Uukuniemi Virus ( <i>Bunyaviridae</i> ) RNA Segments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The role of the variable portion of the noncoding regions (NCRs) of the three Bunyaviridae RNA segments (L, M, S) in transcription, replication, and packaging was studied using the recently developed plasmid-driven RNA polymerase I minigenome system for Uukuniemi (UUK) virus, genus Phlebovirus (11), as a model. Comparison of the different segments showed that all NCRs were sufficient to mediate transcription/replication of a minigenome but demonstrated decreased promoter strength in the order M > L > S. Chimeric minigenomes with flanking NCRs from different genome segments revealed that the number of total base pairs within the inverted, partially complementary ends was important for transcription and replication. Point mutations increasing the base-pairing potential produced increased reporter expression, indicating that complementarity between the 5' and 3' ends is crucial for promoter activity. The role of the intergenic region (IGR) located between the two open reading frames of the ambisense UUK virus S segment was analyzed by inserting this sequence element downstream of the reporter genes. The presence of the IGR was found to enhance reporter expression, demonstrating that efficient transcription termination, regulated by the IGR, is important for optimal minigenome mRNA translation. Finally, genome packaging efficacy varied for different NCRs and was strongest for L followed by M and S. Strong reporter gene activity was still observed after seven consecutive cell culture passages, indicating a selective rather than random genome-packaging mechanism. In summary, our results demonstrate that the NCRs from all three segments contain the necessary signals to initiate transcription and replication as well as packaging. Based on promoter strength, M-segment NCRs may be the preferred choice for the development of reverse genetics and minigenome rescue systems for bunyaviruses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".