MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129557268 · doi:10.1136/gut.51.2.297

Acute appendicitis in Japanese soldiers in Burma: support for the “fibre” theory

2002· letter· en· W2129557268 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Black

Bibliographic record

VenueGut · 2002
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDisaster Response and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAcute appendicitisGeneral surgeryRepatriationAppendicitisIncidence (geometry)SurgeryQuarter (Canadian coin)Sick childHistoryPediatricsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Immunosuppression, IBD, and risk of lymphomaWe read with interest the two recent reports of lymphoma in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (Farrell et al, Gut 2000;47:514-19 and Palli et al, Gastroenterology 2000;119:647-53).We believe the report from Farrell of four cases of lymphoma in a cohort of 782 patients (of whom 238 had received immunosuppression) considerably overestimates the relative risk of lymphoma in IBD patients.They calculate a relative risk of lymphoma as 31 for the whole cohort and 59 for the group treated with immunosuppressives (compared with the general population).Immunosuppressive therapy is well recognised as increasing the risk of developing non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in organ transplant patients.1 The risk of NHL is increased in other inflammatory conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis 2 and psoriasis, although how much is attributable to the underlying disease and how much is due to the drug is unclear.For IBD, if the incidence of lymphoma is indeed increased, is this due to drug or disease?Two recent reviews 3 4 have examined this question in detail.Several large well designed population based studies have been performed specifically to examine the baseline risk of lymphoma in IBD.In none of these studies does the relative risk for NHL significantly exceed one, while only one study (Palli et al) has shown an excess risk of Hodgkin's disease (relative risk 9.3; 95% confidence interval 2.5-23.8).A number of smaller case series have been published which show an increased incidence of NHL.This type of study, although interesting, should not be regarded as evidence of increased risk as case ascertainment bias is likely to exist.Several studies have specifically addressed the question of immunosuppression in IBD.In total, only 11 cases of lymphoma were described in more than 4000 patients who had received immunotherapy, with over 17 000 patient years of follow up.Extrapolating these data to lymphoma rates in the general population may be unreliable, particularly as lymphoma rates vary widely geographically, by sex and age. 5 We believe that compared with the other known risks of immunosuppression, such as myelosuppression and infection, the risk of developing lymphoma (if it does exist) is likely to be of minor clinical significance and to be outweighed by the potential benefit of these treatments in patients with IBD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0090.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGutSame topicDisaster Response and ManagementFrench-language works237,207