A study on the teleoperation of robot systems via WWW
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We describe a study on a teleoperated robot control system developed in the ART (Advanced Robotics and Teleoperation) Lab. at the University of Alberta. When using the system, a remote operator just needs a general-purpose computer with Internet connection and a World Wide Web (WWW) browser to remotely operate the robot through the Internet. A control architecture that combines computer and robot is constructed. This system is divided into two primary parts, the client part, which is executed on the remote operator's computer, and the server part, which resides on the server workstation in the ART Lab. The two parts are connected via the Internet. A graphical interface on the remote computer screen, showing the robot and its environment, enables the remote operator to send control commands to the robot. Communication coordination between the client and the server is developed using Java language. Since the real-time control through the Internet typically suffers from random time-delay and bandwidth constraints, many traditional control methods will suffer from stability and obstacle avoidance related issues. One approach to deal with the mentioned problems is to use event-based control methods for planning and control which have been successful in reducing the effects of the constraints by adopting a nontime based reference system in the control algorithm. We will apply this method in our Internet-based telerobotic systems. The nontime referenced action control scheme is used to deal with the unpredictable time-delays.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".