Analysis and design of bridged NRD-guide coupler for millimeter-wave applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new nonradiative-dielectric (NRD)-guide directional coupler using two NRD waveguides interconnected with a bridge is proposed and demonstrated. Propagation constants of the bridged NRD-guide couplers are investigated with an electric-field integral-equation method, and modeling results show that there is a maximum of coupling coefficient when the thickness of the bridge is made around 0.68 of the plate separation. In this case, the coupling length is reduced approximately 60% and the bandwidth under the tolerance limits of /spl plusmn/0.5 dB of deviation for 3-dB coupling is nearly doubled with reference to its conventional counterparts. The use of a bridge not only improves the mechanical stability, but also makes the coupler performance reproducible. Experimental prototypes are fabricated with two 90/spl deg/ elbow bends that are used for the arms and the bridge-connected coupler section is terminated at both ends by tapered half-circle sections. A calibration procedure is used to remove mismatch effects between the NRD-guide and the rectangular waveguide in the measured results. Advantages of the new coupler as a passive component are shown for millimeter-wave integrated circuits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".