O CÓDIGO DE DEFESA DO CONSUMIDOR E A RESPONSABILIDADE CIVIL DA EMPRESA AÉREA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente artigo tem por proposito expor brevemente o instituto da responsabilidade civil da empresa aerea sob a egide do Codigo de Defesa do Consumidor, tendo em vista que a aviacao civil, no decorrer das ultimas decadas, tem evoluido significativamente e, principalmente no Brasil, com perspectiva futura fabulosa . Em funcao disso, possibilitou-se um aumento na oferta de servico o que, por consequencia, resultou no crescimento da demanda por esta especie de transporte, seja de pessoas ou mercadorias. O consumidor, ao contratar com a empresa aerea ou transportador aereo o servico ofertado, cria com este um vinculo contratual que, ao ser inadimplido, gera o dever de indenizar. Diante disso, revelar-se-a que a responsabilidade civil do transportador aereo domestico e internacional e regulado por leis especiais como o Codigo Brasileiro de Aeronautica e pela Convencao de Montreal (substitutiva da Convencao de Varsovia), respectivamente, sem olvidar que o Codigo Civil de 2002 tambem pode ser aplicado, tanto quanto o Codigo de Defesa do Consumidor, quando necessario, a depender de tratar-se de relacao de consumo ou nao.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".