MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129757873 · doi:10.2113/gscpgbull.54.2.138

Stratigraphy and lithologic heterogeneity in the Mannville Group (southeast Saskatchewan) defined by integrating 3-D seismic and log data

2006· article· en· W2129757873 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Sabrina Sarzalejo

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersU.S. Geological Survey
KeywordsCitationGeologyLibrary scienceStratigraphyLithologyGeochemistryPaleontologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| June 01, 2006 Stratigraphy and lithologic heterogeneity in the Mannville Group (southeast Saskatchewan) defined by integrating 3-D seismic and log data Sabrina Sarzalejo; Sabrina Sarzalejo Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, sabrinas@eps.mcgill.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Bruce S. Hart Bruce S. Hart Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, hart@eps.mcgill.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Sabrina Sarzalejo Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, sabrinas@eps.mcgill.ca Bruce S. Hart Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, hart@eps.mcgill.ca Publisher: Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Received: 10 May 2005 Accepted: 31 Mar 2006 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 2368-0261 Print ISSN: 0007-4802 © The Society of Canadian Petroleum Geologists Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2006) 54 (2): 138–151. https://doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.54.2.138 Article history Received: 10 May 2005 Accepted: 31 Mar 2006 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Sabrina Sarzalejo, Bruce S. Hart; Stratigraphy and lithologic heterogeneity in the Mannville Group (southeast Saskatchewan) defined by integrating 3-D seismic and log data. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 2006;; 54 (2): 138–151. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.54.2.138 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Search Advanced Search Abstract Wireline log and 3-D seismic data were integrated to define stratigraphic units and lithologic heterogeneity in the Mannville Group of southeast Saskatchewan. The Mannville in this area is a stratigraphically complex unit formed of fluvial to marine deposits that, although non-prospective for hydrocarbons in this area, share many similarities with time-equivalent strata in areas of heavy oil production. Seismic sequence stratigraphic principles permitted us to subdivide the Mannville into three packages. The ability to visualize the 3-D seismic data in a variety of ways, including arbitrary lines and stratal or horizon slicing techniques, helped us to define stratigraphic features that would affect fluid flow in hydrocarbon producing areas. These features include channels of various sizes and orientations, and channel elements such as scroll bars and lateral accretion surfaces, that are present within specific portions of the Group. Because the effectiveness of enhanced recovery methods such as steam-assisted gravity drainage depends on a development team’s ability to recognize reservoir heterogeneity, similar integration of 3-D seismic, well logs and other data types would assist greatly in developing the Mannville in heavy oil areas. There is close, but not one-to-one, correspondence between the stratigraphic units we defined and those established by regional log- and core-based correlations. Seismic resolution problems or log correlation styles could be responsible for the differences. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.192

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum GeologySame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207