MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129913025 · doi:10.1109/icc.2008.1086

Can We Multiplex IPTV and TCP?

2008· article· en· W2129913025 on OpenAlexaff
Feng Wan, Lin Cai, Aaron Gulliver

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIPTVComputer networkComputer scienceQuality of serviceMultiplexingTCP global synchronizationTransmission Control ProtocolTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Telecommunication service providers are racing to deliver IPTV/video on demand (VoD), voice, and data, the so called triple-play services. IPTV traffic, supported by the UDP protocol, has highly variable data rates and stringent quality of services (QoS) requirements in terms of delay and loss. Data and VoD flows are normally supported by TCP, which has its own congestion control loop to adjust the sending rate, so the traffic load is also highly dynamic. If IPTV and TCP traffic is simply multiplexed, their performance is difficult to predict and the competition between them will jeopardize their QoS. To efficiently utilize network resources and provide satisfactory QoS for both traffic types, we propose multiplexing IPTV and TCP traffic with the protection of a class based queuing (CBQ) scheme. We also develop an analytical framework to model the multiplexed IPTV traffic and TCP traffic with CBQ. The analytical results can be used as a guide to determine the admission region of IPTV and the CBQ parameters. Simulation results are presented which validate the analytical results and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed solution. By multiplexing IPTV and TCP traffic appropriately, network resources can be more efficiently utilized, the QoS of IPTV can be maintained, and TCP flows can obtain higher throughputs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.020
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207