Complications from residual adnexal structures following enucleation in three dogs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CASE DESCRIPTION: A 3-year-old neutered male Lhasa Apso (dog 1) was evaluated because of chronic swelling at an 8-month-old enucleation site, a 10-year-old spayed female Japanese Chin (dog 2) was evaluated because of chronic swelling at a 6-year-old enucleation site and chronic discharge from a 1-year-old enucleation site, and a 7-year-old spayed female Yorkshire Terrier (dog 3) was evaluated because of chronic discharge from a 3-month-old enucleation site. CLINICAL FINDINGS: In all dogs, surgical exploration revealed substantial retention of adnexal remnants within the original enucleation sites. Diagnoses of subcutaneous membrana nictitans inclusion cyst, orbital pneumatosis, and conjunctival mucocele were made in dogs 1, 2, and 3, respectively. TREATMENT AND OUTCOME: Following cyst excision, dog 1 received a short course of treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and deracoxib. There was no recurrence of clinical signs over a 2-month follow-up period. For dog 2, conjunctival tissue was excised, and the opening of the lower nasolacrimal canaliculus was cauterized. The patient received postoperative administration of deracoxib as well as orbifloxacin and clindamycin pending bacterial culture results, which were negative. There was no recurrence of clinical signs over an 8-month follow-up period. For dog 3, adnexal remnants were excised. The patient received postoperative administration of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and meloxicam. There was no recurrence of clinical signs over a 6-month follow-up period. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Findings in the dogs of this report highlight the need for complete removal of the ocular adnexa to minimize the risk of complications of enucleation in the long-term follow-up period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".