MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130004173 · doi:10.1063/1.1457714

BLAST—a balloon-borne large aperture submillimeter telescope

2002· article· en· W2130004173 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua O. Gundersen, P. A. R. Ade, Jamie Bock, P. de Bernardis, Matt Griffin, M. Halpern, David W. Hughes, Jeff Klein, S. Masi, P. Mauskopf, Barth Netterfield, L. Olmi, D. Scott, Greg Tucker

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSuperconducting and THz Device Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBolometerPhysicsTelescopeMillimeterAstronomyAperture (computer memory)GalaxyBalloonDetectorAstrophysicsRemote sensingOpticsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Balloon-borne Large Aperture Sub-millimeter Telescope (BLAST) incorporates a two meter primary mirror with large-format bolometer arrays consisting of 149, 88, and 43 elements operating at 250, 350 and 500 μm, respectively. The combination of the dramatically increased atmospheric transmission at balloon altitudes and the extended observing time (10–20 days) afforded by a long duration balloon flight will enable the first sensitive, large-area (≫10 deg2) sub-mm surveys at these wavelengths. These surveys will address some of the most important galactic and cosmological questions regarding the formation and evolution of stars, galaxies, and clusters as well as the source(s) of the cosmic infrared background. The BLAST focal plane will consist of arrays of silicon nitride micromesh, “spider-web” bolometric detectors operating at 300 mK coupled to 2 fλ feedhorn arrays. The first overnight test flight of BLAST is scheduled for autumn of 2002, and the first long duration balloon flight is scheduled to be from McMurdo, Antarctica in 2003–2004.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicSuperconducting and THz Device TechnologyFrench-language works237,207