MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130026978 · doi:10.1109/epec.2009.5420816

Data collection, simulation and design of a waste heat energy conversion system

2009· article· en· W2130026978 on OpenAlexaff
Johan Eklund, Ian Spencer, Jinfu Zheng, Neil Yhap, Ryan Naughton, David Mercy, Charles Elliot, Ian Marnoch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMATLABHardware-in-the-loop simulationController (irrigation)Computer scienceEnergy transformationProgrammable logic controllerModeling and simulationControl systemPower (physics)SoftwareWaste heatEfficient energy useControl engineeringSimulationEngineeringMechanical engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the design of a hardware-in-the loop simulation of the Marnoch Thermal Energy Conversion (MTEC) system. The simulation has been designed using MATLAB and Simulink based on data acquired with a National Instruments data acquistion device and a Siemens programmable logic controller. This simulation is designed to allow design and evaluation of increasingly complex versions of the MTEC in which additional tank pairs can be added easily within the simulation to evaluate improvements that result for efficiency and power output. The goal of the system simulation is to test controller designs and to allow them to be used in both software-and hardware-in-the-loop simulations and as a put hardware system. The simulation consists of mechanical simulations of valves, pistons, and other devices, and thermodynamic and mass flow models of the pressure and heating/cooling systems of the MTEC. The resulting simulation is based on data collected from a four-tank MTEC prototype system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207