Unit Commitment With Dual Variable Constraints
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new unit commitment model is proposed for market economies with some form of indivisibilities (nonconvexities). Coordination in electricity pool auction markets with unit commitment is a conspicuous example. This presentation applies to a single-time period unit commitment with no network. The new formulation includes a market coordinator who collects the sale and purchase bids, and determines the optimal solution that balances the total generation with the forecast demand. A solution to the new commitment model is said to be optimal if it maximizes the (monetary) margin of every accepted production unit, while minimizing the sum of the margins of the unaccepted units that would achieve positive margins at the prevailing market price. The new unit commitment model produces a market price that is the system-wide marginal (bid) cost. Some preliminary results are reported, considering the single-period unit commitment problem, which provide some insights into the adequacy of the proposed approach as well as its economic implications as a tool for managing restructured energy systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it