MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mapping and quantifying hyperpolarized <sup>3</sup>He magnetic resonance imaging apparent diffusion coefficient gradients

2008· article· en· W2130145214 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrea Evans, David G. McCormack, Giles Santyr, Grace Párraga

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physiology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersMerck Canada
KeywordsEffective diffusion coefficientNuclear medicineMagnetic resonance imagingStandard deviationVoxelMedicineCoefficient of variationCOPDNuclear magnetic resonanceChemistryRadiologyMathematicsPhysicsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We measured hyperpolarized 3He magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) and quantified ADC gradients in each three-by-three voxel region of interest (ROI). Such local ADC gradients can be represented in vector maps showing the magnitude (|G3x3|) and direction of ADC gradients, providing a qualitative visualization tool and quantitative measurement of airway and air space heterogeneity. Twenty-four subjects (15 male, mean age=67+/-7 yr) with global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) stage II (n=9, mean age 68+/-6 yr), GOLD stage III chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; n=7, mean age 67+/-8 yr), and age-matched healthy volunteers (n=8, mean age 67+/-6 yr) were enrolled based on their age and spirometry results. Hyperpolarized 3He MRI was performed on a whole body 3.0 Tesla system. Mean 3He ADC and ADC standard deviation were calculated for the center coronal slice, and the mean magnitude and direction of the ADC gradient vectors were calculated for each three-by-three voxel matrix (|G3x3|). While the 3He ADC standard deviation was not significantly different, mean |G3x3| was significantly different between subjects with stage II (0.14+/-0.03 cm/s) and stage III COPD (0.19+/-0.03 cm/s; P<0.005) and between healthy subjects (0.12+/-0.03 cm/s) and those with stage II COPD (P<0.02). The second order statistic |G3x3| may provide a sensitive measure of ADC heterogeneity for ROI representing 9.4x9.4x30 mm or 2.6 cm3 of lung tissue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysiologySame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207