MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2130272879 · doi:10.1017/s0954422412000133

Dietary patterns: a novel approach to examine the link between nutrition and cognitive function in older individuals

2012· review· en· W2130272879 on OpenAlexaffabout
Benjamin Allès, Cécilia Samieri, Catherine Féart, M.-A. Jutand, Danielle Laurin, Pascale Barberger‐Gateau

Bibliographic record

VenueNutrition Research Reviews · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
FundersInstituto DanoneVifor PharmaAgence Nationale de la RechercheGroupe Lipides et NutritionDanone
KeywordsCognitive declineDementiaCognitionMediterranean dietGerontologyMedicineDashDiseaseBody mass indexEnvironmental healthPsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.438
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.026 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations174
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNutrition Research Reviews→Same topicNutritional Studies and Diet→French-language works237,207→