MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130274802 · doi:10.1002/cmr.b.21288

Transmit‐only/receive‐only radiofrequency coil configuration for hyperpolarized <sup>129</sup>Xe <scp>MRI</scp> of rat lungs

2015· article· en· W2130274802 on OpenAlexafffund
Ozkan Doganay, Kundan Thind, Trevor Wade, Alexei Ouriadov, Giles Santyr

Bibliographic record

VenueConcepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenThunder Bay Regional Research InstituteRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsElectromagnetic coilRadiofrequency coilNuclear magnetic resonanceNuclear medicineChemistryBiomedical engineeringPhysicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report a novel radiofrequency (RF) transmit‐only/receive‐only (TO/RO) coil configuration providing excellent transmit B 1+ field uniformity as well as high sensitivity for hyperpolarized 129 Xe MR lung imaging of rats at 3T (35.34 MHz). The TO/RO coil configuration consisted of two separate components: (i) a high‐pass birdcage transmit coil which produces a homogeneous B 1+ magnetic field, (ii) a saddle‐shaped single‐turn receive‐only surface coil that couples closely to the rat lung. On transmit, the receive‐only coil is decoupled from the transmit coil using a detuning circuit. On receive, the bird‐cage coil is deactivated through the use of PIN diodes. The sensitivity and uniformity of the saddle‐shaped receive coil were optimized solving the Biot‐Savart equation using 3D finite element modeling. The electrical performance of the new TO/RO configuration in transmit/receive (T/R) mode was compared with a commercial T/R birdcage coil of similar diameter, which was considering to be the gold standard for conventional T/R mode imaging. Experimental results in phantoms confirm that our novel TO/RO coil configuration provides a factor of three increase in SNR without compromising B 1 transmit uniformity compared with the commercial T/R birdcage coil configuration. The novel TO/RO coil was successfully tested for in vivo rat lung imaging. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Concepts Magn Reson Part B (Magn Reson Engineering) 45B: 115–124, 2015

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConcepts in Magnetic Resonance Part BSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207