MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130279916 · doi:10.1109/tit.2004.833337

Efficient Source Decoding Over Memoryless Noisy Channels Using Higher Order Markov Models

2004· article· en· W2130279916 on OpenAlexaff
Farshad Lahouti, Amir K. Khandani

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecoding methodsRedundancy (engineering)AlgorithmEncoderComputer scienceMarkov processComputational complexity theoryMarkov chainMaximum a posteriori estimationA priori and a posterioriChannel (broadcasting)MathematicsTelecommunicationsMaximum likelihoodStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exploiting the residual redundancy in a source coder output stream during the decoding process has been proven to be a bandwidth-efficient way to combat noisy channel degradations. This redundancy can be employed to either assist the channel decoder for improved performance or design better source decoders. In this work, a family of solutions for the asymptotically optimum minimum mean-squared error (MMSE) reconstruction of a source over memoryless noisy channels is presented when the redundancy in the source encoder output stream is exploited in the form of a /spl gamma/-order Markov model (/spl gamma//spl ges/1) and a delay of /spl delta/,/spl delta/>0, is allowed in the decoding process. It is demonstrated that the proposed solutions provide a wealth of tradeoffs between computational complexity and the memory requirements. A simplified MMSE decoder which is optimized to minimize the computational complexity is also presented. Considering the same problem setup, several other maximum a posteriori probability (MAP) symbol and sequence decoders are presented as well. Numerical results are presented which demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Information TheorySame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207