Bi <sub>n</sub> <sup>+</sup> cluster ion sources for investigation of a covalently immobilized mixed film composed of oligonucleotides and poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) brushes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The ability of Bi n + cluster ion sources to provide information about the physical structure of an integrated film composed of oligonucleotides and non‐nucleic acid oligomers of poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) has been explored using static time‐of‐flight (ToF) SIMS (ToF‐SIMS). Fragment intensities from PHEMA and oligonucleotides were compared. Negative ion spectra indicated that the Bi 5 + source provided details that were either not apparent or at much reduced sensitivity when using Bi 3 + and Bi + sources. The Bi 3 + ion source provided higher secondary ion intensities for positive ion fragments, and more than 200‐fold selectivity for ionization of oligonucleotide in comparison to PHEMA when in mixture, even though the oligonucleotides were not immobilized as a coating superimposed on PHEMA. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".