MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130301086 · doi:10.1002/sia.3431

Bi <sub>n</sub> <sup>+</sup> cluster ion sources for investigation of a covalently immobilized mixed film composed of oligonucleotides and poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) brushes

2010· article· en· W2130301086 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSurface and Interface Analysis · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIon-surface interactions and analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOligonucleotideMethacrylateIonCovalent bondSelectivityPolymer chemistryChemistryMaterials scienceNucleic acidSecondary ion mass spectrometryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Cluster (spacecraft)PolymerCopolymerOrganic chemistryDNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The ability of Bi n + cluster ion sources to provide information about the physical structure of an integrated film composed of oligonucleotides and non‐nucleic acid oligomers of poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) has been explored using static time‐of‐flight (ToF) SIMS (ToF‐SIMS). Fragment intensities from PHEMA and oligonucleotides were compared. Negative ion spectra indicated that the Bi 5 + source provided details that were either not apparent or at much reduced sensitivity when using Bi 3 + and Bi + sources. The Bi 3 + ion source provided higher secondary ion intensities for positive ion fragments, and more than 200‐fold selectivity for ionization of oligonucleotide in comparison to PHEMA when in mixture, even though the oligonucleotides were not immobilized as a coating superimposed on PHEMA. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it