Influence of urbanization on riparian and algal species composition in two rivers of central Italy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comparative analysis of allergenic potential, conducted in different urban ecosystems of central Italy, utilizing the species allergen index \n(SAI), revealed the differences among various urban ecosystems. Allergophyte presence and abundance are influenced by the type and \nduration of anthropogenic intervention, correlated to the ecological conditions of the individual urban areas and to the level of stability \nattained. The geographic position of the city and the layout of the urban surfaces present here are also important for the presence of the \nallergenic flora. The characteristic urbanistic layout of central Italian cities, which is the result of the historical and cultural vicissitudes of \nthe human population, facilitates the establishment of allergophytes. A rich allergenic flora was found on the ancient city enclosure walls \nwith a great risk for the inhabitants suffering from allergies. The influence of the geographic-climatic gradient on the quality of the urban \nallergenic contingent was observed. The group of strongly allergenic species was found in both the coastal and the hilly-vegetation belt \ncities. The dynamic contacts with the surrounding ecosystems and ecotonal areas are more accentuated in the cities situated in the internal, \nhilly zone of the territory studied. Here different potentially allergenic species coming from the surrounding ecosystems become part of \nthe urban flora. The abundance of this flora is noted in the unstable areas of the periphery, where numerous moderately allergenic species \nwere established too. The renewal of the allergenic flora of a city happens thus from within, through the introduction of exotic species in \nthe cultivated areas, and from without, through the spontaneous establishment of plants from surrounding ecosystems. The results obtained \ncan be utilized to indicate the parts of the urban territory which are not suitable for the permanence of persons who suffer from allergic \ndiseases, in order to improve their life quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".