MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130608493 · doi:10.1513/pats.200808-089rm

Remodeling in Asthma

2009· review· en· W2130608493 on OpenAlexaff
Céline Bergeron, Wisam Al-Ramli, Qutayba Hamid

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the American Thoracic Society · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreHôtel-Dieu de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAirwayAsthmaFibrosisAirway hyperresponsivenessTissue remodelingIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosisPathologyImmunologyInflammationLungInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Airway remodeling refers to the structural changes that occur in both the large and the small airways of miscellaneous diseases, including asthma. In asthma, airway structural changes include subepithelial fibrosis, increased smooth muscle mass, enlargement of glands, neovascularization, and epithelial alterations. Although controversial, airway remodeling is commonly attributed to the underlying chronic inflammatory process. These remodeling changes contribute to thickening of airway walls and consequently lead to airway narrowing, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, airway edema, and mucous hypersecretion. Airway remodeling is associated with poorer clinical outcome among patients with asthma. Early diagnosis and prevention of airway remodeling has the potential to decrease disease severity, to improve control, and to prevent disease expression. In this article, we briefly provide an update on the characteristic features of airway remodeling observed in asthma and their clinical consequences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations189
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the American Thoracic SocietySame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207