A survey of Relate psychosexual therapy clients, January to March 2002
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A survey of Relate psychosexual therapy clients was conducted between January and March 2002. Relates sex therapists filled in a questionnaire about their current clients. The response rate was 66% and covered 592 client hours. Analysis of the clients presenting problems showed that the sexual problem was considered to be the womans in half the cases, the mans in just over a quarter and joint in just under a quarter of cases. The most common female sexual problem was lack of desire followed by vaginismus. For men the most common problem was erectile dysfunction, present in nearly a third of cases. For men almost half of the remaining cases were split evenly between loss of desire for sex and the presence of more than one sexual problem. When both partners were admitting they had a sexual problem the most common combination was a shared loss of sexual desire. Overall a third of cases involved more than one sexual dysfunction. In nearly 50% of cases there were medical problems present which were contributing to the sexual problem. Since the last published survey of Relate psychosexual therapy clients the age profile of male clients (but not female clients) has changed significantly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it