MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130831158 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22023

A case study in multi‐scale model reduction: The effect of cell density on catalytic converter performance

2014· article· en· W2130831158 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Anton Fadic, Teng‐Wang Nien, Joseph P. Mmbaga, Robert E. Hayes, Martin Votsmeier

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAUTO21 Network of Centres of ExcellenceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsReduction (mathematics)Scale (ratio)ConvertersCatalytic combustionTransient (computer programming)MonolithMethaneRange (aeronautics)CombustionCatalytic converterComputer scienceFull scaleSteady state (chemistry)CatalysisComputational fluid dynamicsDiffusionSimulationProcess engineeringMaterials scienceMechanicsChemistryEngineeringPhysicsMathematicsElectrical engineeringThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the challenges of full‐scale computer simulation of a catalytic reactor is to consider the different scales involved in the problem in a practical fashion. In a monolith catalytic converter, these scales range from the molecular scale for the reactions, through the pore scale, washcoat scale, channel scale, and finally the full converter scale. This paper describes the implementation of a model reduction methodology using look‐up tables to perform a consistent comparison of six different catalytic converters used for the catalytic combustion of methane. A detailed mechanistic model for methane combustion is used. Diffusion in the non‐uniform washcoat is considered. The converters have different cell densities and wall thicknesses. Steady state and transient light‐off simulations are performed. Efficient computational speed is achieved by successive model reduction, which allows the preservation of detailed small‐scale information. The results obtained show that there is a non‐intuitive relationship between the various operating parameters, which can only be deduced from a comprehensive model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicLattice Boltzmann Simulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207