MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130839692 · doi:10.1139/b05-063

Chloroplast haplotype diversity patterns in<i>Packera pauciflora</i>(Asteraceae) are affected by geographical isolation, hybridization, and breeding system

2005· article· en· W2130839692 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
John F. Bain, Joanne L. Golden

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDisjunctChloroplast DNAMonophylyBiologyPhylogeographyHaplotypeNucleotide diversityAsteraceaeDisjunct distributionPopulationEcologyGeographyBiogeographyZoologyEvolutionary biologyCladePhylogeneticsDemographyPhylogenetic treeGenotypeGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Packera pauciflora (Pursh) Löve &amp; Löve is a wide ranging alpine or subalpine species that is disjunct in three regions of North America: the northern Rocky mountains, Quebec–Labrador, and the Sierra Nevada of California. It is one of two Packera species known to be self-fertile. We assessed intrapopulational chloroplast haplotype diversity (n) and haplotype nucleotide diversity ([Formula: see text]) and found it was lower and population structure (Φ st ), higher than all but one of the five other Packera species examined to date. In addition, distinct differences exist between populations from California and those from the Rocky mountains and eastern Canada. Our results suggest that geographical isolation, hybridization, and breeding system have all played a role in the formation of haplotype diversity patterns, and that, in spite of the wide disjunctions, the species is monophyletic.Key words: Asteraceae, cpDNA, haplotypes, Packera, phylogeography, self-fertility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy StudiesFrench-language works237,207