Stored Fas Ligand, a Mediator of Rapid CTL-Mediated Killing, Has a Lower Threshold for Response Than Degranulation or Newly Synthesized Fas Ligand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CTL lyse target cells through the release of cytolytic granule mediators and expression of the death receptor ligand Fas ligand (FasL). We previously demonstrated that FasL is stored in vesicles distinct from cytolytic granules and is translocated to the cell surface within 15 min of TCR stimulation, followed by a later wave of newly synthesized FasL cell surface expression at 2 h poststimulation. Initial studies suggested that the two FasL responses had different signaling thresholds. To test this possibility directly, we titrated Ag presented to murine CTL to measure FasL and degranulation response thresholds. Stored FasL translocation to the cell surface required substantially lower concentrations of peptide than was required for de novo expression of FasL and degranulation. Furthermore, a low-affinity agonist peptide stimulated strong stored FasL translocation but only limited de novo FasL expression and degranulation. These data imply that the two FasL populations may have distinct functions. We examined bystander killing and found that the rapidly expressed FasL triggered highly specific lysis of target cells, as did degranulation. In contrast, the newly synthesized later wave of FasL mediated extensive Fas-dependent bystander killing. Our data indicate that stored FasL is mobilized in response to low concentrations of Ag to mediate rapid, highly specific lysis of target cells, whereas the later, newly synthesized FasL requires higher concentrations of Ag and mediates indiscriminate lysis. These findings suggest that early and late FasL and degranulation represent nonredundant lytic mechanisms that have been selected for distinct situations, possibly for optimal pathogen clearance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".